The Handover
Home/Managing at a distance/Difficult conversations at a distance

Managing at a distance

Difficult conversations at a distance

The temptation is to handle them in writing, where they land worse and are remembered longer.

7 min read409 wordsUpdated July 2026

Every manager eventually has to tell someone their work is not good enough, that a promotion is not happening, or that a role is ending. Remotely, the mechanics of doing that well change. For broader context on privacy and workplace data, ICO employment guidance is a useful reference.

Never in writing first

Written delivery of difficult news is easier for the sender and considerably worse for the recipient. It arrives without warning, is read alone, cannot be asked about immediately, and is re-read repeatedly in its harshest possible interpretation.

Say it on a call, with video. Then confirm in writing the same day, which is what protects both parties on the substance. For a practical software-side reference on documenting performance conversations, this template guide adds useful detail.

Written follow-up, spoken first

The conversation establishes the relationship and allows questions. The written summary establishes the record. Reversing the order damages both.

Do not schedule it into a normal slot

A difficult conversation dropped into a regular one-to-one ambushes someone who arrived expecting something else. A meeting invitation with an ominous title and no context leaves them speculating for a day.

The workable middle is a short-notice call with a brief, honest framing — something like wanting to talk about how the last few months have gone — scheduled within a day rather than a week.

Watch the time zone

Delivering difficult news at the end of someone's day means they are alone with it overnight with nobody to talk to. Scheduling it at the start of their day, with availability afterwards, is a small consideration that matters a great deal.

Never on a Friday afternoon in their local time, which is the same mistake with a longer gap.

Be specific, and be brief

Vagueness is the commonest failure in these conversations, and remote delivery makes it worse because the manager cannot read the room and tends to soften further.

Specific examples, stated plainly, with what needs to be different and by when. A person who leaves the call unclear about whether they have a problem will conclude that they do not.

Leave silence

Video conversations tempt both parties to fill pauses, and the manager usually fills them by softening what was just said. Say the thing, then stop, and let the other person respond in their own time.

Follow up sooner than feels necessary

In an office, the day after a difficult conversation involves incidental contact that signals the relationship is intact. Remotely there is nothing, and silence reads as consequence.

A short check-in the following day, and a scheduled follow-up on the substance, is what prevents a legitimate conversation from becoming a rupture.

General information. Nothing here is legal, employment or tax advice. Employment law, working time rules, on-call compensation and the rules on monitoring employees differ substantially between countries — and a distributed team is usually subject to several at once. Take qualified advice on your own situation.

Related

Continue reading